Institute for the Advancement of Justice and Disability Rights

Justice is an indispensable cornerstone of a human society that realizes its full potential.

Throughout the world, systems of jurisprudence are used by every country to ensure “the rule of law.” But the rule of law is not the same as justice. It is essential to continually monitor and study jurisprudence to differentiate between current jurisprudence and justice. Only by identifying the conflicts between the two and processes to address the deviation is a meaningful improvement of jurisprudence possible.

In every country, jurisprudence has a history. Whether it is organic to that society, transplanted from elsewhere, or is a blend of multiple sources, it needs to evolve and stay in tune with the evolution of humanity and the times. For this, awareness of each system’s fundamental assumptions and precepts, and their historical roots and evolution, are essential. It is vital to subject that system to quality and effectiveness tests.

Humanity’s history demonstrates changes in norms and attitudes, and beliefs. Like a growing child, people mature and change with time. Any system of jurisprudence needs to address new issues, thus requiring modernization over time through the inclusion of current knowledge and beliefs and continually leaving antiquity and keeping up with the current heartbeat of life to not impede the expansion of collective consciousness.

Failure to evolve jurisprudence and minimize its divergence from justice is a fundamental restrictive influence on the evolution of humanity.

At no time has the pace of human progress and expansion of human consciousness in commonly-accepted recorded history been more speedy and potent than today. Therefore, this institute aspires to research and evaluate, on an ongoing basis, the divergence between jurisprudence and justice and identify processes and means to minimize the deviation of jurisprudence from justice. As a media organization, the institute will also publish information about issues and needs related to its goal to keep the public informed and invite their participation and contribution to its efforts to benefit humanity.

Using principles used in testing highly complex and interdependent systems, it is no surprise that this institute pays attention to “boundary testing” principles. In such testing, the most vulnerable and disadvantaged person is followed through jurisprudence to see the result. In a global society where the belief that “money buys justice” is firmly held by all, if the most vulnerable and disadvantaged person with no money is put through jurisprudence, the correct outcome is justice independent of vulnerability, disadvantage, or money. The very existence of this institute is a testament that this simple test has failed catastrophically. A very effective litmus test is the plight of persons with disability who flesh out the divergence of jurisprudence from justice.

In studying jurisprudence, we intend to marry statistical methods with qualitative analyses. Patterns embedded, for example, in public records of litigation contain valuable information that characterizes the effectiveness of systems of jurisprudence according to criteria that this institute hopes to evolve and identify for the public benefit.

Watch this website for research, articles, publications, and news releases in the coming months.

DISCLAIMER: The Institute for the Advancement of Justice and Disability Rights ("IAJDR") is not a law firm, does not act as your attorney, and is not a substitute for advice from an attorney. IAJDR does not provide any legal advice, and none of the information provided herein or on any completed document should be construed as legal advice. IAJDR cannot provide legal advice.

The information on this website is provided free of charge for informational purpose only.

Institute for Advancement of Justice & Disability Rights – A California Non-Profit Public Benefit Organization Entity Number 5723791 –501(c)(3) status in progress and pending approval by IRS